Electronic Public Access
to Court Records


Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction
Section 1
Section 2
Summary
Appendix
Section 1.1 - Public Access to the Courts 

Public Access Workflow
When information about a particular case is needed, the public typically makes a trip to the courthouse. Parking may be a problem, especially in larger cities. Finding the right courthouse may be another problem, especially in larger cities with multiple courts and court locations. Once the public arrives at the court house, s/he must often find the right court or division  and often must wait in line before asking the counter clerk to retrieve the requested case file. The public then reviews the file and documents searching for a piece of information, either at the counter or a separate area near the counter. When completed, the public then returns the case file to the counter clerk. If the public requests photo copies, additional forms may need to be filled out. 

Court Clerk Workflow
There is another viewpoint from the clerk’s perspective. The case file must be logged out and then logged in when returned. The clerk must find the file and pull it from the file cabinet. If an “old” file, it may need to be retrieved from the basement or off-site storage. When the public is finished with the case file, the clerk must then re-shelve the file. Often there is a time lapse to re-shelving the case file, due to required assistance at the counter. During that time, the case file is unavailable to anyone else who may need to review the case file or information. 

Accessing Public Records
Public access to court records can be provided in one or more of three basic ways: 

  • through printed output generated by the court’s computer system;
  • through court owned and operated computer workstations located in the courthouse;
  • remotely through computers owned and controlled by the public or by intermediaries, like public libraries or through 3rd party providers.
Electronic Public Access
Electronic public access can encompass a variety of technologies, including intelligent voice response systems, bulletin board systems, Internet, imaging, handheld devices, dial-up computer interfaces, and multimedia kiosks. They may be operated entirely by the court or involve a third- party service provider. Remote access can be provided through court electronic bulletin boards, direct dial up, through the Internet, wide area networks or through 3rd party service providers. Any form of remote access theoretically increases the risk of unauthorized intrusion in the computer system, but common and industry-wide recognized techniques of protection reduce the risk well within acceptable levels.


Legal Technology Institute
University of Florida Levin College of Law
352.392.2278
adkins@law.ufl.edu